On June 25, 2025, the grounds of the South Calcutta Law College—a place meant to be a sanctuary for the study and upholding of justice—became the scene of a brutal violation that would test the very principles it taught. A 24-year-old first-year student, a young woman at the beginning of her legal career, reported that she had been gang-raped inside the campus’s own guard room. The alleged
Alleged is a term used in legal contexts to describe an accusation or claim that has been made against an individual but has not yet been proven or confirmed. Read Full Definition perpetrators were not strangers, but an alumnus and two senior students, individuals who should have been her peers and mentors.
- Background: The Social and Contextual Crucible
- Timeline of a Tragedy: From a Complaint to a Chargesheet
- The Forensic Crucible: Reconstructing the Crime
- DNA Analysis: The Unimpeachable Witness
- Digital Forensics: The Silent Observer
- Emerging Evidence: Voice Sample Analysis
- A System on Trial: Legal Proceedings and Accountability
- Conclusion: Lessons from a Converged Investigation
- How the convergence of DNA and digital evidence built an irrefutable case in the 2025 South Calcutta Law College rape, bringing scientific certainty to a crime hidden behind closed doors.
The case immediately presented a profound forensic challenge. In the absence of impartial eyewitnesses, such crimes often devolve into a “he said, she said” scenario, where justice can be agonizingly elusive. However, the investigation by the Kolkata Police would become a powerful demonstration of how the silent, objective testimony of modern science can speak with an undeniable voice. This case study provides a definitive forensic analysis of the investigation, deconstructing how the powerful synergy of DNA profiling
Evidence is any form of proof, such as objects, materials, or scientific findings, presented to establish or disprove a fact in a legal proceeding. It is used to reconstruct events and link or exclude individuals Read Full Definition, cutting through denials and establishing a scientific certainty that would form the bedrock of the prosecution’s case.
Background: The Social and Contextual Crucible
The crime took place within the complex social ecosystem of a university, where established hierarchies and power dynamics can create vulnerabilities. The survivor was a first-year student, new to the institution and its social circles. The prime accused, Monojit ‘Mango’ Mishra, was an alumnus, a position that can carry an aura of authority and influence over current students. His alleged accomplices, Pramit Mukherjee and Zaib Ahmed, were senior students, further cementing the power imbalance at play.
The alleged assault occurred not in a public space, but in the semi-secluded guard room of the college—a location that should have been a point of security but was instead co-opted as the crime scene. This detail is crucial, as it points to a brazen act and a potential lapse in the very systems designed to protect students. The subsequent implication of the on-duty security guard, not for participation but for a dereliction of duty, underscores a systemic failure that contributed to the tragedy. This case, therefore, is not just about the actions of individuals but also about the institutional responsibility to ensure the safety of its students, a theme that resonates across campuses in India and globally.
Timeline of a Tragedy: From a Complaint to a Chargesheet
The investigation moved swiftly from the initial complaint to the filing of a robust, evidence-based chargesheet.
| Date | Event | Key Details & Citations |
| June 25, 2025 | The Alleged Assault | A 24-year-old first-year student is allegedly gang-raped inside the guard room of South Calcutta Law College. The complaint names alumnus Monojit Mishra as the primary assailant, with senior students Pramit Mukherjee and Zaib Ahmed acting as lookouts. |
| Post-June 25, 2025 | Complaint and Arrests | The survivor lodges a formal complaint with the Kolkata Police. An investigation is launched, leading to the arrest of Mishra, Mukherjee, Ahmed, and the on-duty security guard for his alleged negligence. |
| By Sept. 21, 2025 | Chargesheet Filed | The Kolkata Police submit a comprehensive chargesheet to the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore. The document names all four accused and is heavily reliant on the forensic evidence gathered. |
The Forensic Crucible: Reconstructing the Crime
With the accused in custody, the burden of proof fell on the forensic investigation team. Their work focused on two primary pillars—DNA and digital evidence—to corroborate the survivor’s testimony and dismantle any potential defense.
More Read
DNA Analysis: The Unimpeachable Witness
In sexual assault cases, DNA
DNA, or Deoxyribonucleic Acid, is the genetic material found in cells, composed of a double helix structure. It serves as the genetic blueprint for all living organisms. Read Full Definition evidence is often the most powerful tool for establishing truth. It provides an objective, scientific link that is nearly impossible to refute. The investigating officers in this case executed a textbook forensic collection and analysis protocol.
- The Evidence Collection: Investigators meticulously collected biological samples from the survivor’s clothes. To create a basis for comparison, they also took reference blood samples from both the 24-year-old survivor and all the accused individuals.
- The Definitive Match: The analysis yielded a crucial breakthrough. The DNA profile generated from biological material found on the survivor’s clothing was a direct match to the prime accused, Monojit ‘Mango’ Mishra. This finding provided the “smoking gun” of the investigation, scientifically placing his biological material on the survivor.
- Corroborating the Location: Beyond the direct match, police sources stated that the DNA tests also “corroborated the presence of both the survivor and the accused at the crime spot”. This is a critical forensic detail. By likely identifying both the survivor’s and the accused’s DNA within the guard room, investigators could scientifically validate the survivor’s account of where the assault took place, preemptively countering any defense claims that an encounter occurred elsewhere. A police officer involved in the case rightly identified the DNA report as “one of the important pieces of evidence”.
Digital Forensics: The Silent Observer
While DNA evidence established the “who,” digital forensics provided the “where” and “how,” creating a visual narrative that corroborated the roles of all involved.
- CCTV Footage: Investigators collected CCTV footage not only from within the college premises but also from two nearby shops outside the campus. This wide net of digital evidence collection allowed them to build a comprehensive timeline of movements.
- Visual Corroboration: The footage was damning. It confirmed that the crime spot was indeed inside the guard’s room, as the survivor had stated. Crucially, it also captured the actions of the other accused. The footage showed Pramit Mukherjee and Zaib Ahmed standing outside the room, consistent with the allegation that they were acting as lookouts. The actions of the security guard, which demonstrated a lapse in his duty, were also visible on the recording.
Emerging Evidence: Voice Sample Analysis
The investigation did not stop at DNA and CCTV. Police also collected voice samples from the mobile phones of the accused. While the results were pending at the time the initial chargesheet was filed, this line of inquiry shows the depth of the forensic investigation. Voice analysis could potentially uncover evidence of conspiracy, threats, or admissions discussed between the accused before, during, or after the crime. Investigators planned to file a supplementary chargesheet once the voice analysis reports were complete.
A System on Trial: Legal Proceedings and Accountability
The culmination of the forensic investigation was the submission of a robust chargesheet to the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore. The strength of the case lies in the powerful synergy of its evidence. The DNA provided the irrefutable biological link between the prime accused and the survivor, while the CCTV footage provided the visual context, implicating the accomplices and confirming the location of the crime.
The handling of the case also reflects adherence to critical legal and ethical standards in India. In line with Supreme Court directives on cases related to sexual assault, the survivor’s identity was not revealed in any official reports to protect her privacy and dignity. This procedural correctness is vital for ensuring that the pursuit of justice does not inflict further trauma on the survivor.
Conclusion: Lessons from a Converged Investigation
The South Calcutta Law College case is a powerful and affirming example of how a modern, multi-disciplinary forensic investigation can deliver justice. It demonstrates that when biological and digital evidence converge, they can create a narrative so compelling and scientifically sound that it becomes nearly unassailable. The DNA provided the intimate, microscopic truth of the assault, while the CCTV cameras provided the macroscopic, objective view of the events as they unfolded.
This case serves as a crucial lesson for law enforcement and the legal community. It underscores that in the fight against sexual violence, science is one of the most powerful allies. By meticulously collecting and analyzing every available trace—from a microscopic skin cell on a piece of clothing to a fleeting image on a security camera—investigators can build a case that honors the survivor’s testimony with the unimpeachable backing of forensic fact. The pursuit of justice for the young woman in Kolkata is a testament to the power of science to ensure that even in the darkest of rooms, the truth can be brought to light.
Anatomy of a Forensic Takedown
How the convergence of DNA and digital evidence built an irrefutable case in the 2025 South Calcutta Law College rape, bringing scientific certainty to a crime hidden behind closed doors.
Section 1
The Crime
Section 2
The Two Pillars of Forensic Evidence
Pillar 1: DNA — The Unimpeachable Witness
In what could have been one person’s word against another, the survivor’s clothing held microscopic, probativeProbative - possessing the potential to provide details that are valuable to an investigation. Read Full Definition truth.
Pillar 2: CCTV — The Silent Observer
DNA established the biological link; CCTV constructed the temporal narrative and roles.
Section 3
The Power of Convergence
Together, these pillars formed an unbroken chain of evidence, taking the case from allegation to science-backed proof and reducing room for reasonable doubt.
Section 4
The Legal Outcome
Note: All references reflect allegations and investigative findings as reported; final adjudication rests with the court.
